13 September 2010

Coal has a Future in Australia

Australia's Labor party just cannot escape the issues associated with trying to present a credible climate policy.  The latest twist comes in the form of its newly appointed Climate Change Minister Greg CombetThe Australian reports:
As part of its deal to secure government, Labor signed a formal alliance with the Greens, whose policies include the eventual phasing out of the coal industry, Australia's biggest export earner.

But in an interview with The Australian, Mr Combet said his background as a former coal engineer, union official and MP with coal workers in his NSW electorate meant he did not believe his job was to shut down the coal industry.

"I don't agree with that. That's not part of my job at all," he said.

"I am acutely aware of the challenges that this policy presents. But people jump to these absolute positions, and I just don't think that's appropriate.

"I've got a responsibility to support those people's jobs. The coal industry is a very vibrant industry with a strong future. What you've got to do is look to how we can achieve in the longer term things like carbon capture and storage for coal-fired power stations." . . .

Mr Combet said he was not in the business of applying the adjective "dirty" to coal.

"People will use whatever language they want. But you won't hear me using it," he said. "You do not take the back of the axe to the fundamentals of the Australian economy. We just work through it very carefully with reforms such as energy efficiency improvements, where you can reduce emissions quite significantly. With investment in renewable energy sources, which will help us reduce emissions significantly and work towards introducing a carbon price. The key thing about a carbon price, from my point of view, from the outset is that it created an incentive to reduce emissions . . . but do it sensibly. And we did do it with the CPRS (carbon pollution reduction scheme), with all the negotiations we had with industry. We've got to keep it on it a commonsense frame."

Mr Combet said he believed he knew the industry "very well" but conceded he had a lot to learn, particularly about international negotiations.

He declined to criticise Senator Wong or Mr Rudd's failure to deliver on an emissions trading scheme in the previous term, describing it as a complex area.

"I am certainly not going to criticise any of my colleagues. I mean, I've been involved in the portfolio over the past 18 months. People can criticise me too if they wish," he said. "There's no doubt that Kevin Rudd was fundamentally committed to dealing with climate change. The new PM is fundamentally committed. We were so close to getting it through."
It is a simple mathematical reality that Australia cannot meet even the least ambitious targets for emissions reductions with coal having today's share in Australia's energy mix (of consumption plus exports, see figure above) -- unless CCS is perfected.  Eventually, something will have to give here -- coal, CPRS, Labor, Greens or Combet.  Time will tell which it is.

6 comments:

Harrywr2 said...

"coal having today's share in Australia's energy mix (of consumption plus exports, see figure above)"

It's worse then you think, Australia exports an additional 130 million tonnes per year of coking coal.

declank said...

If you're getting your news from The Australian, you're doing it wrong.

They are not a news organisation but a politically partisan Murdoch mouthpiece

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3010433.htm

Roger Pielke, Jr. said...

-2-declank

Thanks for the tip .. are you suggesting that Combet didn't say these things?

Bill Kerr said...

The Australian has declared itself proud to target The Greens in editorial policy for their weirdness in wanting to reduce CO2 urgently but at the same time wanting to ban export of uranium from Australia. The Greens have now declared that the real reason for their vote increase was their anti-uranium policy.

So, The Green strategy is to make impossible demands on Labour, which both Labour and Liberal reject and of course Labour and Liberal have the combined numbers if it comes to a vote. Then The Greens can say to their supporters something like - "look we tried but the mainstream parties are against us". It's going to be a weird coalition b/w Labour and The Greens.

Greens fight Labour on Uranium
Greens' uranium stance dated

Noelene said...

Don't listen to him.He is obviously a greenie who believes The Australian picks on poor little Bob Brown.Of course The Australian got it right.It's published in the paper that declank would read.
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/combet-says-coal-industry-is-safe-20100913-1577j.html
The greens want the carbon tax,I think they will look to gain more power before they really push their agenda.Labor is not interested in cutting emissions.whatever makes you think that?They can quite happily back the coal industry while imposing hardship on the Australian people.They have no morals.

heyworth said...

My tip: the government will meet its targets by a combination of strategies, including creative accounting and, if necessary, buying carbon credits offshore. They could do the latter very cheaply at the moment.

In the longer term, nuclear power shouldn't be discounted as an option for Australia. Public perceptions are changing - see the Washington Post's survey at the bottom of this article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/13/AR2010091304026_pf.html

Post a Comment