Republican presidential candidate and Texas Gov. Rick Perry recently questioned the science of climate change in ways so unsupported by evidence that Glenn Kessler, the "Fact Checker" columnist at The Washington Post, gave him a rating of "four Pinocchios." Perry's is but one scientific misstatement among many that regularly roil the US political scene. What is the proper scientific response to the political distortion -- or even outright rejection -- of science? In coming weeks, three Bulletin experts will offer authoritative and at times provocative analysis.I suppose that last bit is supposed to refer to me ;-) My piece starts out, "Here we go again ..." I'll post a link on Thursday.
Also, today I am giving a talk here at CU on this same topic. Here are the details:
Scientists in Policy and Politics
COSI Seminar
Monday, October 24, 2011 - 4:00pm - 5:00pm
Engineering Bldg. - ECCR 1B55
Roger Pielke Jr.
Professor - Center for Science and Technology Policy Research - University of Colorado at Boulder
Scientists, and experts more generally have choices about the roles that they play in today's political debates on topics such as global warming, genetically modified foods, and food and drug safety, just to name a few. This talk is about understanding these choices, their theoretical and empirical bases, what considerations are important to think about when deciding, and the consequences for the individual scientist and the broader scientific enterprise.
Roger A. Pielke, Jr. has been on the faculty of the University of Colorado since 2001 and is a Professor in the Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). At CIRES, Roger served as the Director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research from 2001-2007. Roger's research focuses on the intersection of science and technology and decision making. In 2006 Roger received the Eduard Brückner Prize in Munich, Germany for outstanding achievement in interdisciplinary climate research. Before joining the University of Colorado, from 1993-2001 Roger was a Scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Roger is a Senior Fellow of the Breakthrough Institute. He is also author, co-author or co-editor of seven books, including The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics published by Cambridge University Press in 2007. His most recent book is The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming.


2 comments:
Here's a link to the WaPo "Fact Check" of Perry regarding climate science.
It appears to boil down to an argument over the science being settled or not (Perry sez nuh-uh, WaPo sez uh-huh, in case you couldn't guess). So I guess the "scientific statement" referred to is about the science of discerning consensus.
So, is the Bulletin being deliberately provocative or are they just poor writers?
Kessler's "fact check" was short on facts, but large on logical fallacy. I imagine if he and Perry actually debated the state of the science, both would break the error meter from overuse.
Post a Comment