Catastrophe bonds and other insurance-related securities have no correlation to the broader markets. In 2008, the Swiss Re catastrophe bond index rose 2.3 percent, compared with a loss of 38 percent in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. The catastrophe bond index returned 10.5 percent from 2007 through 2010, compared with an 11 percent fall in the S.&P.Take a second look at the first paragraph above -- cat bonds outperformed the S&P 500 from 2007-2010. What should we take from that? Not much, other than the randomness of extreme events.
“The fact that we demonstrated positive returns has been very helpful in getting new funds into the space,” said Paul Schultz, president of Aon Benfield’s investment banking division, which packages and sells catastrophe bonds. “We have more investors participating in this asset class than ever before. There’s a growing following and growing level of interest.”
The graph at the top of this post shows the number of days in between major US hurricane landfalls, that is, storms of Category 3 or stronger strength, which are responsible for more than 85% of historical normalized damage. The data comes from the ICAT Damage Estimator. The red line shows the (non)trend in this metric over the past 111 years. There were 42 such storms in the first half of the record (1900-1954) and 37 in the second half (1955-2010).
What is interesting is that that presently we are in the midst of the third longest period (over 1900-2011) during which a major hurricane has not hit the US, since 1915. It will become the second longest streak if a major storm does not strike before August 31, 2011.
The fact that cat bonds outperformed from 2007-2010 in all likelihood reflects the present drought in major hurricane landfalls, a streak that will have to end sometime and perhaps in spectacular fashion. Just as the market overreacted in 2005 after a single season that saw 4 major hurricane strikes, the market today risks overreacting in the other direction. I don't run a hedge fund, but if I did, I'd be taking a good hard look at cat bonds to see if I could gain some leverage using that tried and true formula for success -- regression to the mean.
3 comments:
Can't find a cat bond ETF. Darn.
This is a wonderful opportunity for climate skeptics and AGW believers to recreate the famous Simon-Ehrlich bet. Presumably a skeptic, not believing hurricanes are growing more frequent or more severe over time, would regard these bonds as an opportunity, whereas an AGW proponent would sell rarher than buy.
Me, I tend to believe that climate patterns tend to be correlated in the short term. A hurricane-free year is more likely to be folllowed by another.
hmm. lack of landfall does not mean lack of hurricanes or a downturn in number/severity.
http://www.ouramazingplanet.com/2010-hurricane-season-tropical-storms-0671/
many parameters, so it's not a simple matter to predict the exact actions of these weather systems. who knows what the next five years will bring when it comes to landfall. a small twitch in pressure systems can completely change the picture. if you all will be selling, i may be buying at a low price. who knows, eh...
Hedge Funds try to maximize return relative to risk.
Today that is more true than ever before. Many quantitative fund managers will quote you extremely specific ranges of risk/volatility within which they keep their funds on a daily or hourly basis.
Cat bonds would not likely be a welcome addition. The risk from a serious storm is highly asymmetrical (which in and of itself plays games with the assumptions in many risk models), and there is no easy way to hedge that risk.
In short, the expected return would have to be very impressive indeed for hedge funds to be interested.
Post a Comment