I have a commentary in this week's issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education, and since being put online over the past weekend has led to a lot of reaction, including several requests to republish. To preempt some of the misdirected critique that I've already seen -- the piece does not call for the end of in-state tuition, the argument is more nuanced than that, and the piece does not call for the end of state subsidies for college attendance by in-state students.
To see what the commentary does argue, see it in full here, and feel free to come back here to discuss and debate!